Yaz On Trial : Yaz Birth Control Lawsuit : Info on Yasmin & Ocella Side Effects

Since Judge Herndon appointed the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee for the Yaz and Yasmin Multi-District Litigation (MDL) the main focus has been case organization, specifically what procedures are needed for efficient case management.

To keep this matter from getting too cluttered and costly, Judge Herndon and those of us on the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee and defense counsel have focused on the case management and organizational issues early on, which we hope will make everything run more smoothly down the road in the litigation. At the December status conference, we discussed details such as the protocol for protecting confidential information in the case, how new complaints filed on behalf of injured women and their families will be organized, and what additional procedures may be required since Bayer is a foreign company. At the close of the conference we were also introduced to Ms. Debra Ward, the Judge’s new law clerk specifically assigned to the Yaz and Yasmin MDL proceeding. Ms. Ward will be assisting Judge Herndon in organizing the case going forward.

In summary, the Court is primarily in organizational mode at this time. As Judge Herndon said during the December status conference, “the Court would like this case to move along efficiently and effectively. Both sides are working diligent[ly] and in good faith to move this litigation at a fast pace and court is encouraged by that. [The] Court has had to intervene very little.”

The next status conference in the case is March 4, 2010.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

We speak with women on a daily basis who want to know more about what’s going on with the Yaz and Yasmin lawsuits. Many have heard that it’s a type of lawsuit known as a "mass tort." Naturally, the next question we hear is “so what is a mass tort?”

A mass tort typically involves multiple personal injury cases where the victims are injured in a similar way by a specific product, drug, or event. Because all of the victims’ claims typically share common legal or factual questions, the courts recognize that sometimes it makes more sense for the common questions for all the lawsuits to be resolved by a single judge in one court. Once the common questions are resolved, the individual cases are sent back to the individual courts for trial.

I took a look online for more information about Mass Tort cases and found some interesting info. A blog dedicated entirely to Mass Tort Litigation is talking about the Yaz and Yasmin lawsuits. A few months ago, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, who is one of the authors of the blog and an Assistant Professor of Law at Florida State University College of Law, wrote that the Yaz and Yasmin lawsuits might be centralized. This is because lawsuits that involve hundreds of victims can become really complicated and disorganized when they proceed on an individual basis (imagine hundreds of cases brought against the same companies in all different courts spread throughout the whole country); centralizing these cases helps to prevent this. Just as Ms. Burch predicted, the federal lawsuits against Yaz and Yasmin were centralized and are now part of a Multi-District Litigation.

So here's the basic breakdown: if a large number of people suffer similar injuries after using a common product, then frequently those individuals’ legal claims many be coordinated into a mass tort lawsuit, which is usually centralized in one court with one judge in order to resolve any common questions.

Hope that helps sort out some of the confusion, but feel free to ask or comment if there are any other questions.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link