Yaz Attorney A.J. De Bartolomeo answers questions about Yaz on Trial

Ever wonder why we started our blog? Find out why!

Yaz on Trial author and Girard Gibbs' Partner A.J. De Bartolomeo was recently interviewed about blogging, the lawsuits against the makers of Yaz, Yasmin and Ocella, and her recent appointment to the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee in the Yaz and Yasmin Multi-District Litigation. Here's an excerpt from the interview:

Lisa Kennelly: Why did you decide to start a blog?

A.J. De Bartolomeo: Earlier this year we were contacted by a mother of 3-year old twins who had suffered a stroke and permanent brain damage after taking the birth control pill Yaz (which incidentally is the top-selling birth control pill sold in the U.S.). We began investigating her claims further and soon learned that she was not alone and that many women had suffered severe health side effects after taking the birth control pills Yaz, Yasmin and Ocella. The injuries ranged from strokes to blood clots to gallbladder disease and many other serious health problems. When we spoke to these women and their families they repeatedly questioned why they hadn't heard about these health risks and wanted to know what was going on with the lawsuits against the makers of Yaz, Yasmin and Ocella.

Based on those conversations, my co-counsel, Mike Danko and I decided to start our blog, Yaz on Trial. We felt that something was needed to get the word out to women and educate people about the health risks associated with these drugs and a blog seemed a great way to do that. We recognize that mass litigation, like the Yaz and Yasmin lawsuits, can be very complicated and difficult to understand, so we wanted to create an outlet for women and their families to get a clear understanding of how the litigation is playing out. One thing led to another and Yaz on Trial was born.

Lisa Kennelly: What has been most rewarding about blogging?

A.J. De Bartolomeo: The most rewarding thing about blogging is having the opportunity to connect to people through the blog itself. We speak to women every day who have questions about the litigation against the makers of Yaz and Yasmin, and we have found that typically when one person has a question, many others have the same question as well. The blog is a great way to help answer some of those questions and keep people informed about the litigation. A good example is our post about the Yasmin and Yaz Multi-District litigation. Several people had questions about what Multi-District Litigation was and found that post very helpful.

Yaz/Yasmin Lawsuits and a "Mass Tort"

We speak with women on a daily basis who want to know more about what’s going on with the Yaz and Yasmin lawsuits. Many have heard that it’s a type of lawsuit known as a "mass tort." Naturally, the next question we hear is “so what is a mass tort?”

A mass tort typically involves multiple personal injury cases where the victims are injured in a similar way by a specific product, drug, or event. Because all of the victims’ claims typically share common legal or factual questions, the courts recognize that sometimes it makes more sense for the common questions for all the lawsuits to be resolved by a single judge in one court. Once the common questions are resolved, the individual cases are sent back to the individual courts for trial.

I took a look online for more information about Mass Tort cases and found some interesting info. A blog dedicated entirely to Mass Tort Litigation is talking about the Yaz and Yasmin lawsuits. A few months ago, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, who is one of the authors of the blog and an Assistant Professor of Law at Florida State University College of Law, wrote that the Yaz and Yasmin lawsuits might be centralized. This is because lawsuits that involve hundreds of victims can become really complicated and disorganized when they proceed on an individual basis (imagine hundreds of cases brought against the same companies in all different courts spread throughout the whole country); centralizing these cases helps to prevent this. Just as Ms. Burch predicted, the federal lawsuits against Yaz and Yasmin were centralized and are now part of a Multi-District Litigation.

So here's the basic breakdown: if a large number of people suffer similar injuries after using a common product, then frequently those individuals’ legal claims many be coordinated into a mass tort lawsuit, which is usually centralized in one court with one judge in order to resolve any common questions.

Hope that helps sort out some of the confusion, but feel free to ask or comment if there are any other questions.

The Word Spreads About Yaz and Yasmin Lawsuits

The press continues to get the word out about the potential side effects of the birth control pills Yaz and Yasmin. Yesterday, a California consumer protection group called The Civil Justice Research Project reported on the status of the litigation and the claims brought by women and their families who have suffered after taking Yaz, Yasmin or Ocella. The group reported that some women have suffered strokes, pulmonary emboli and heart attacks after taking these birth control pills.

In addition to the health concerns, the group also reported on Bayer’s “aggressive advertising,” noting that the FDA found that some of the Yaz commercials were misleading, because they undersold the risks of the drug while at the same time overstating its benefits. Although the article acknowledged that Bayer ran a multi-million dollar corrective ad campaign, it also explains that some find those corrective ads to be “too confusing and jargon-filled to be effective.”

Two of the authors of this blog, Yaz attorneys A.J. De Bartolomeo and Mike Danko, and were also mentioned in the article for their work representing injured women in the Yaz and Yasmin lawsuits. Articles like this one really help spread the word about the potential side effects of Yaz, Yasmin and Ocella, and keep people informed about what’s happening with the lawsuits.